<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Twitter Inc Will Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://renaudbourassa.com/blog/2009/05/05/why-twitter-inc-will-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://renaudbourassa.com/blog/2009/05/05/why-twitter-inc-will-fail/</link>
	<description>Welcome to my World. Here, I am the Architect.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The reason for Twitter’s downfall &#124; co&#62;innovative</title>
		<link>http://renaudbourassa.com/blog/2009/05/05/why-twitter-inc-will-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5191</link>
		<dc:creator>The reason for Twitter’s downfall &#124; co&#62;innovative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renaudbourassa.com/blog/?p=328#comment-5191</guid>
		<description>[...] Many have listed their reasoning for Twitter’s ultimate demise ranging from spam, to lack of monetization, to a steep dropoff of new users, but I believe the best argument has been articulated in various forms by Dave Winer and Marc Canter who have been saying for a while that the service Twitter offers should not be controlled by a single company and in fact cannot be controlled by a single company long term. A single owner creates a bottleneck, fail whales, and stifled innovation. A communication platform such as this will be subsumed into the web as a distributed service. There is no one Email Company, no RSS Company &#8212; these are distributed services that interact through standard interfaces. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many have listed their reasoning for Twitter’s ultimate demise ranging from spam, to lack of monetization, to a steep dropoff of new users, but I believe the best argument has been articulated in various forms by Dave Winer and Marc Canter who have been saying for a while that the service Twitter offers should not be controlled by a single company and in fact cannot be controlled by a single company long term. A single owner creates a bottleneck, fail whales, and stifled innovation. A communication platform such as this will be subsumed into the web as a distributed service. There is no one Email Company, no RSS Company &#8212; these are distributed services that interact through standard interfaces. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DHTwitter: A Vision of a Distributed Twitter &#124; Renaud Bourassa</title>
		<link>http://renaudbourassa.com/blog/2009/05/05/why-twitter-inc-will-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>DHTwitter: A Vision of a Distributed Twitter &#124; Renaud Bourassa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renaudbourassa.com/blog/?p=328#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Twitter Inc Will FailThird Overall at Yahoo! HACK [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Twitter Inc Will FailThird Overall at Yahoo! HACK [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
